Correlation Between Procter Gamble and United States

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and United States at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and United States into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble DRC and United States Steel, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and United States and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of United States. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and United States.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and United States

0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and United is 0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble DRC and United States Steel in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on United States Steel and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble DRC are associated (or correlated) with United States. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of United States Steel has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and United States go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and United States

Assuming the 90 days horizon Procter Gamble DRC is expected to generate 0.41 times more return on investment than United States. However, Procter Gamble DRC is 2.46 times less risky than United States. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. United States Steel is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  332,100  in Procter Gamble DRC on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  26,900  from holding Procter Gamble DRC or generate 8.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble DRC  vs.  United States Steel

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble DRC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble DRC are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
United States Steel 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in United States Steel are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak primary indicators, United States showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble and United States Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and United States

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and United States positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, United States can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in United States will offset losses from the drop in United States' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble DRC and United States Steel pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance