Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Anfield Resources. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources

-0.37
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Anfield is -0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Anfield Resources and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Anfield Resources. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Anfield Resources has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.16 times more return on investment than Anfield Resources. However, Procter Gamble is 6.23 times less risky than Anfield Resources. It trades about 0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Anfield Resources is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,930  in Procter Gamble on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,001  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 5.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Anfield Resources

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Anfield Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Anfield Resources are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak fundamental indicators, Anfield Resources reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Anfield Resources can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Anfield Resources will offset losses from the drop in Anfield Resources' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Anfield Resources pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Funds Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals