Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Salesforce

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Salesforce at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Salesforce into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Salesforce, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Salesforce and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Salesforce. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Salesforce.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Salesforce

-0.49
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Salesforce is -0.49. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Salesforce in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Salesforce and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Salesforce. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Salesforce has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Salesforce go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Salesforce

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 3.75 times less return on investment than Salesforce. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 1.76 times less risky than Salesforce. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Salesforce is currently generating about 0.36 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  29,377  in Salesforce on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,825  from holding Salesforce or generate 16.42% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Salesforce

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Salesforce 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Salesforce are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, Salesforce displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble and Salesforce Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Salesforce

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Salesforce positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Salesforce can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Salesforce will offset losses from the drop in Salesforce's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Salesforce pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm