Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Energizer Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Energizer is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Energizer Holdings and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Energizer Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Energizer Holdings has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 1.0 times more return on investment than Energizer Holdings. However, Procter Gamble is 1.0 times more volatile than Energizer Holdings. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Energizer Holdings is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,497  in Procter Gamble on November 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  102.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 0.62% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Energizer Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Energizer Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energizer Holdings are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Energizer Holdings is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Energizer Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energizer Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Energizer Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Energizer Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum