Correlation Between Procter Gamble and FT Cboe

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and FT Cboe at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and FT Cboe into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and FT Cboe Vest, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and FT Cboe and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of FT Cboe. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and FT Cboe.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and FT Cboe

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and FAPR is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and FT Cboe Vest in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FT Cboe Vest and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with FT Cboe. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FT Cboe Vest has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and FT Cboe go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and FT Cboe

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 2.34 times more return on investment than FT Cboe. However, Procter Gamble is 2.34 times more volatile than FT Cboe Vest. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. FT Cboe Vest is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,260  in Procter Gamble on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,676  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 10.31% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  FT Cboe Vest

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
FT Cboe Vest 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FT Cboe Vest are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, FT Cboe is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Procter Gamble and FT Cboe Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and FT Cboe

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and FT Cboe positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, FT Cboe can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FT Cboe will offset losses from the drop in FT Cboe's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and FT Cboe Vest pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.