Correlation Between Procter Gamble and First American

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and First American at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and First American into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and First American Funds, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and First American and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of First American. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and First American.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and First American

-0.4
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and First is -0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and First American Funds in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on First American Funds and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with First American. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of First American Funds has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and First American go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and First American

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 12.86 times less return on investment than First American. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 21.31 times less risky than First American. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. First American Funds is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  338.00  in First American Funds on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (238.00) from holding First American Funds or give up 70.41% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  First American Funds

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
First American Funds 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in First American Funds are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, First American is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble and First American Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and First American

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and First American positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, First American can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in First American will offset losses from the drop in First American's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and First American Funds pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories