Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Flowers Foods. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Flowers is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Flowers Foods and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Flowers Foods. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Flowers Foods has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.74 times more return on investment than Flowers Foods. However, Procter Gamble is 1.35 times less risky than Flowers Foods. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Flowers Foods is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  14,205  in Procter Gamble on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,423  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 24.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Flowers Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Flowers Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Flowers Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy essential indicators, Flowers Foods is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Flowers Foods can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Flowers Foods will offset losses from the drop in Flowers Foods' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Flowers Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio