Correlation Between Procter Gamble and IShares Russell

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and IShares Russell at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and IShares Russell into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and iShares Russell Mid Cap, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and IShares Russell and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of IShares Russell. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and IShares Russell.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and IShares Russell

-0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and IShares is -0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and iShares Russell Mid Cap in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on iShares Russell Mid and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with IShares Russell. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of iShares Russell Mid has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and IShares Russell go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and IShares Russell

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 5.09 times less return on investment than IShares Russell. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 1.07 times less risky than IShares Russell. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. iShares Russell Mid Cap is currently generating about 0.39 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  11,979  in iShares Russell Mid Cap on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,250  from holding iShares Russell Mid Cap or generate 10.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  iShares Russell Mid Cap

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
iShares Russell Mid 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in iShares Russell Mid Cap are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively uncertain basic indicators, IShares Russell reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble and IShares Russell Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and IShares Russell

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and IShares Russell positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, IShares Russell can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in IShares Russell will offset losses from the drop in IShares Russell's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and iShares Russell Mid Cap pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data