Correlation Between Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of ENEOS Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings

-0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and ENEOS is -0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ENEOS Holdings and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with ENEOS Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ENEOS Holdings has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.7 times more return on investment than ENEOS Holdings. However, Procter Gamble is 1.43 times less risky than ENEOS Holdings. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ENEOS Holdings is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,603  in Procter Gamble on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  625.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 3.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  ENEOS Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
ENEOS Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days ENEOS Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, ENEOS Holdings is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, ENEOS Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ENEOS Holdings will offset losses from the drop in ENEOS Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and ENEOS Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm