Correlation Between Procter Gamble and MCF Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and MCF Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and MCF Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and MCF Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and MCF Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of MCF Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and MCF Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and MCF Energy

-0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and MCF is -0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and MCF Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MCF Energy and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with MCF Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MCF Energy has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and MCF Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and MCF Energy

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.1 times more return on investment than MCF Energy. However, Procter Gamble is 9.65 times less risky than MCF Energy. It trades about 0.37 of its potential returns per unit of risk. MCF Energy is currently generating about -0.25 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,508  in Procter Gamble on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,462  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 8.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  MCF Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
MCF Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days MCF Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Procter Gamble and MCF Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and MCF Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and MCF Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, MCF Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MCF Energy will offset losses from the drop in MCF Energy's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and MCF Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.