Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Macmahon Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings

0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Macmahon is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Macmahon Holdings and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Macmahon Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Macmahon Holdings has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 64.04 times less return on investment than Macmahon Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 4.31 times less risky than Macmahon Holdings. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Macmahon Holdings Limited is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  17.00  in Macmahon Holdings Limited on November 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5.00  from holding Macmahon Holdings Limited or generate 29.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy99.2%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Macmahon Holdings Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Macmahon Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Macmahon Holdings Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest fragile performance, the Stock's technical indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Macmahon Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Macmahon Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Macmahon Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Macmahon Holdings Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals