Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Regents Park

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Regents Park at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Regents Park into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Regents Park Hedged, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Regents Park and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Regents Park. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Regents Park.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Regents Park

-0.2
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Regents is -0.2. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Regents Park Hedged in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Regents Park Hedged and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Regents Park. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Regents Park Hedged has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Regents Park go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Regents Park

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 1.97 times more return on investment than Regents Park. However, Procter Gamble is 1.97 times more volatile than Regents Park Hedged. It trades about 0.35 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Regents Park Hedged is currently generating about 0.35 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,518  in Procter Gamble on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,408  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 8.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Regents Park Hedged

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Regents Park Hedged 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Regents Park Hedged are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak technical indicators, Regents Park may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Procter Gamble and Regents Park Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Regents Park

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Regents Park positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Regents Park can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Regents Park will offset losses from the drop in Regents Park's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Regents Park Hedged pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device