Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Listed Funds

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Listed Funds at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Listed Funds into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Listed Funds Trust, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Listed Funds and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Listed Funds. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Listed Funds.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Listed Funds

-0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Listed is -0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Listed Funds Trust in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Listed Funds Trust and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Listed Funds. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Listed Funds Trust has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Listed Funds go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Listed Funds

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 8.43 times more return on investment than Listed Funds. However, Procter Gamble is 8.43 times more volatile than Listed Funds Trust. It trades about 0.38 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Listed Funds Trust is currently generating about -0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,508  in Procter Gamble on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,462  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 8.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Listed Funds Trust

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Listed Funds Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Listed Funds Trust are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Listed Funds is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble and Listed Funds Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Listed Funds

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Listed Funds positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Listed Funds can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Listed Funds will offset losses from the drop in Listed Funds' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Listed Funds Trust pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance