Correlation Between Procter Gamble and GENERAL

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and GENERAL at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and GENERAL into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and GENERAL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of GENERAL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and GENERAL.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and GENERAL

-0.6
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and GENERAL is -0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with GENERAL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and GENERAL go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and GENERAL

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 2.62 times more return on investment than GENERAL. However, Procter Gamble is 2.62 times more volatile than GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL. It trades about 0.28 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL is currently generating about -0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,717  in Procter Gamble on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,219  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 7.29% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, GENERAL is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble and GENERAL Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and GENERAL

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and GENERAL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, GENERAL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GENERAL will offset losses from the drop in GENERAL's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and GENERAL MOTORS FINANCIAL pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets