Correlation Between Procter Gamble and United States

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and United States at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and United States into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and United States Basketball, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and United States and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of United States. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and United States.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and United States

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and United is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and United States Basketball in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on United States Basketball and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with United States. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of United States Basketball has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and United States go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and United States

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 61.45 times less return on investment than United States. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 35.32 times less risky than United States. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. United States Basketball is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  38.00  in United States Basketball on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (11.00) from holding United States Basketball or give up 28.95% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy30.51%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  United States Basketball

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
United States Basketball 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days United States Basketball has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite quite persistent fundamental drivers, United States is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

Procter Gamble and United States Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and United States

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and United States positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, United States can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in United States will offset losses from the drop in United States' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and United States Basketball pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments