Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind Science, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Xinjiang Goldwind. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Xinjiang is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind Science in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Xinjiang Goldwind Science and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Xinjiang Goldwind. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Xinjiang Goldwind Science has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.35 times more return on investment than Xinjiang Goldwind. However, Procter Gamble is 2.86 times less risky than Xinjiang Goldwind. It trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Xinjiang Goldwind Science is currently generating about -0.21 per unit of risk. If you would invest  17,827  in Procter Gamble on November 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (773.00) from holding Procter Gamble or give up 4.34% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy68.97%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Xinjiang Goldwind Science

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Xinjiang Goldwind Science 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Xinjiang Goldwind Science has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Xinjiang Goldwind can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Xinjiang Goldwind will offset losses from the drop in Xinjiang Goldwind's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Xinjiang Goldwind Science pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing