Correlation Between PING and Puffer
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PING and Puffer at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PING and Puffer into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PING and Puffer, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PING and Puffer and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PING with a short position of Puffer. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PING and Puffer.
Diversification Opportunities for PING and Puffer
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between PING and Puffer is 0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PING and Puffer in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Puffer and PING is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PING are associated (or correlated) with Puffer. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Puffer has no effect on the direction of PING i.e., PING and Puffer go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between PING and Puffer
If you would invest 5.72 in PING on November 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding PING or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 4.76% |
Values | Daily Returns |
PING vs. Puffer
Performance |
Timeline |
PING |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Puffer |
PING and Puffer Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with PING and Puffer
The main advantage of trading using opposite PING and Puffer positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PING position performs unexpectedly, Puffer can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Puffer will offset losses from the drop in Puffer's long position.The idea behind PING and Puffer pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.
Other Complementary Tools
Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios |