Correlation Between Quanta Services and Great Lakes

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Quanta Services and Great Lakes at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Quanta Services and Great Lakes into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Quanta Services and Great Lakes Dredge, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Quanta Services and Great Lakes and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Quanta Services with a short position of Great Lakes. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Quanta Services and Great Lakes.

Diversification Opportunities for Quanta Services and Great Lakes

0.95
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Quanta and Great is 0.95. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Quanta Services and Great Lakes Dredge in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Great Lakes Dredge and Quanta Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Quanta Services are associated (or correlated) with Great Lakes. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Great Lakes Dredge has no effect on the direction of Quanta Services i.e., Quanta Services and Great Lakes go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Quanta Services and Great Lakes

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Quanta Services is expected to generate 0.74 times more return on investment than Great Lakes. However, Quanta Services is 1.36 times less risky than Great Lakes. It trades about 0.28 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Great Lakes Dredge is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest  31,336  in Quanta Services on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,956  from holding Quanta Services or generate 9.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Quanta Services  vs.  Great Lakes Dredge

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Quanta Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Quanta Services are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively fragile basic indicators, Quanta Services reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Great Lakes Dredge 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Great Lakes Dredge are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Great Lakes exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Quanta Services and Great Lakes Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Quanta Services and Great Lakes

The main advantage of trading using opposite Quanta Services and Great Lakes positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Quanta Services position performs unexpectedly, Great Lakes can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Great Lakes will offset losses from the drop in Great Lakes' long position.
The idea behind Quanta Services and Great Lakes Dredge pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities