Correlation Between QBE Insurance and Ming Le

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both QBE Insurance and Ming Le at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining QBE Insurance and Ming Le into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between QBE Insurance Group and Ming Le Sports, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on QBE Insurance and Ming Le and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in QBE Insurance with a short position of Ming Le. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of QBE Insurance and Ming Le.

Diversification Opportunities for QBE Insurance and Ming Le

0.65
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between QBE and Ming is 0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding QBE Insurance Group and Ming Le Sports in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ming Le Sports and QBE Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on QBE Insurance Group are associated (or correlated) with Ming Le. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ming Le Sports has no effect on the direction of QBE Insurance i.e., QBE Insurance and Ming Le go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between QBE Insurance and Ming Le

Assuming the 90 days horizon QBE Insurance Group is expected to generate 0.76 times more return on investment than Ming Le. However, QBE Insurance Group is 1.32 times less risky than Ming Le. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ming Le Sports is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  731.00  in QBE Insurance Group on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  489.00  from holding QBE Insurance Group or generate 66.89% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

QBE Insurance Group  vs.  Ming Le Sports

 Performance 
       Timeline  
QBE Insurance Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

24 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in QBE Insurance Group are ranked lower than 24 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, QBE Insurance reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Ming Le Sports 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ming Le Sports are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Ming Le unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

QBE Insurance and Ming Le Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with QBE Insurance and Ming Le

The main advantage of trading using opposite QBE Insurance and Ming Le positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if QBE Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Ming Le can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ming Le will offset losses from the drop in Ming Le's long position.
The idea behind QBE Insurance Group and Ming Le Sports pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency