Correlation Between REC and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both REC and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining REC and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between REC Limited and Procter Gamble Health, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on REC and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in REC with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of REC and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for REC and Procter Gamble

0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between REC and Procter is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding REC Limited and Procter Gamble Health in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble Health and REC is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on REC Limited are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble Health has no effect on the direction of REC i.e., REC and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between REC and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon REC Limited is expected to under-perform the Procter Gamble. In addition to that, REC is 1.99 times more volatile than Procter Gamble Health. It trades about -0.18 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble Health is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  523,805  in Procter Gamble Health on November 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,625  from holding Procter Gamble Health or generate 0.31% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

REC Limited  vs.  Procter Gamble Health

 Performance 
       Timeline  
REC Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days REC Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.
Procter Gamble Health 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble Health are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

REC and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with REC and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite REC and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if REC position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind REC Limited and Procter Gamble Health pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data