Correlation Between Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cohen Steers Total and Cohen Steers Closed, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cohen Steers with a short position of Cohen Steers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers.

Diversification Opportunities for Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers

0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cohen and Cohen is 0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cohen Steers Total and Cohen Steers Closed in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cohen Steers Closed and Cohen Steers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cohen Steers Total are associated (or correlated) with Cohen Steers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cohen Steers Closed has no effect on the direction of Cohen Steers i.e., Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Cohen Steers Total is expected to generate 0.91 times more return on investment than Cohen Steers. However, Cohen Steers Total is 1.1 times less risky than Cohen Steers. It trades about -0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cohen Steers Closed is currently generating about -0.24 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,198  in Cohen Steers Total on January 8, 2025 and sell it today you would lose (108.00) from holding Cohen Steers Total or give up 9.02% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cohen Steers Total  vs.  Cohen Steers Closed

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cohen Steers Total 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Cohen Steers Total has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. Despite fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.
Cohen Steers Closed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Cohen Steers Closed has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. Despite inconsistent performance in the last few months, the Fund's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in May 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the mutual fund stockholders.

Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cohen Steers and Cohen Steers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cohen Steers position performs unexpectedly, Cohen Steers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cohen Steers will offset losses from the drop in Cohen Steers' long position.
The idea behind Cohen Steers Total and Cohen Steers Closed pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.