Correlation Between Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Royalty Management Holding and PennantPark Floating Rate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Royalty Management with a short position of PennantPark Floating. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating.
Diversification Opportunities for Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating
-0.13 | Correlation Coefficient |
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Royalty and PennantPark is -0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Royalty Management Holding and PennantPark Floating Rate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PennantPark Floating Rate and Royalty Management is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Royalty Management Holding are associated (or correlated) with PennantPark Floating. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PennantPark Floating Rate has no effect on the direction of Royalty Management i.e., Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Royalty Management Holding is expected to under-perform the PennantPark Floating. In addition to that, Royalty Management is 5.99 times more volatile than PennantPark Floating Rate. It trades about -0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. PennantPark Floating Rate is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 1,078 in PennantPark Floating Rate on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 38.00 from holding PennantPark Floating Rate or generate 3.53% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Royalty Management Holding vs. PennantPark Floating Rate
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Royalty Management |
| PennantPark Floating Rate |
Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating
The main advantage of trading using opposite Royalty Management and PennantPark Floating positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Royalty Management position performs unexpectedly, PennantPark Floating can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PennantPark Floating will offset losses from the drop in PennantPark Floating's long position.| Royalty Management vs. Analog Devices | Royalty Management vs. Hafnia Limited | Royalty Management vs. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings | Royalty Management vs. Paysafe |
| PennantPark Floating vs. Gladstone Investment | PennantPark Floating vs. Horizon Technology Finance | PennantPark Floating vs. Stellus Capital Investment | PennantPark Floating vs. Prospect Capital |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
Other Complementary Tools
| Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
| Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing |