Correlation Between Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New York, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Oppenheimer Rochester with a short position of Franklin New. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New.

Diversification Opportunities for Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New

0.89
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Oppenheimer and Franklin is 0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New York in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Franklin New York and Oppenheimer Rochester is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Oppenheimer Rochester are associated (or correlated) with Franklin New. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Franklin New York has no effect on the direction of Oppenheimer Rochester i.e., Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New

Assuming the 90 days horizon Oppenheimer Rochester is expected to generate 1.38 times more return on investment than Franklin New. However, Oppenheimer Rochester is 1.38 times more volatile than Franklin New York. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Franklin New York is currently generating about 0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,513  in Oppenheimer Rochester on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  20.00  from holding Oppenheimer Rochester or generate 1.32% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Oppenheimer Rochester  vs.  Franklin New York

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Oppenheimer Rochester 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Oppenheimer Rochester are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Oppenheimer Rochester is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Franklin New York 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin New York are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Franklin New is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New

The main advantage of trading using opposite Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Oppenheimer Rochester position performs unexpectedly, Franklin New can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Franklin New will offset losses from the drop in Franklin New's long position.
The idea behind Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin New York pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio