Correlation Between Financial Services and Banking Fund

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Financial Services and Banking Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Financial Services and Banking Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Financial Services Fund and Banking Fund Class, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Financial Services and Banking Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Financial Services with a short position of Banking Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Financial Services and Banking Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Financial Services and Banking Fund

0.99
  Correlation Coefficient

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Financial and Banking is 0.99. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Financial Services Fund and Banking Fund Class in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Banking Fund Class and Financial Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Financial Services Fund are associated (or correlated) with Banking Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Banking Fund Class has no effect on the direction of Financial Services i.e., Financial Services and Banking Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Financial Services and Banking Fund

Assuming the 90 days horizon Financial Services Fund is expected to generate 0.49 times more return on investment than Banking Fund. However, Financial Services Fund is 2.02 times less risky than Banking Fund. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Banking Fund Class is currently generating about -0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest  10,030  in Financial Services Fund on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (61.00) from holding Financial Services Fund or give up 0.61% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Financial Services Fund  vs.  Banking Fund Class

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Financial Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Financial Services Fund are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Financial Services may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Banking Fund Class 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Banking Fund Class are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Banking Fund may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Financial Services and Banking Fund Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Financial Services and Banking Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Financial Services and Banking Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Financial Services position performs unexpectedly, Banking Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Banking Fund will offset losses from the drop in Banking Fund's long position.
The idea behind Financial Services Fund and Banking Fund Class pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope