Correlation Between Financial Services and Retailing Fund

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Financial Services and Retailing Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Financial Services and Retailing Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Financial Services Fund and Retailing Fund Investor, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Financial Services and Retailing Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Financial Services with a short position of Retailing Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Financial Services and Retailing Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Financial Services and Retailing Fund

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Financial and Retailing is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Financial Services Fund and Retailing Fund Investor in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Retailing Fund Investor and Financial Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Financial Services Fund are associated (or correlated) with Retailing Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Retailing Fund Investor has no effect on the direction of Financial Services i.e., Financial Services and Retailing Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Financial Services and Retailing Fund

Assuming the 90 days horizon Financial Services Fund is expected to generate 0.96 times more return on investment than Retailing Fund. However, Financial Services Fund is 1.04 times less risky than Retailing Fund. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Retailing Fund Investor is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,984  in Financial Services Fund on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,456  from holding Financial Services Fund or generate 49.48% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Financial Services Fund  vs.  Retailing Fund Investor

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Financial Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Financial Services Fund are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Financial Services showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Retailing Fund Investor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Retailing Fund Investor are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Retailing Fund may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Financial Services and Retailing Fund Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Financial Services and Retailing Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Financial Services and Retailing Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Financial Services position performs unexpectedly, Retailing Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Retailing Fund will offset losses from the drop in Retailing Fund's long position.
The idea behind Financial Services Fund and Retailing Fund Investor pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity