Correlation Between Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Commodities Strategy Fund and Fidelity Managed Retirement, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Commodities Strategy with a short position of Fidelity Managed. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed.
Diversification Opportunities for Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed
0.18 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Commodities and Fidelity is 0.18. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Commodities Strategy Fund and Fidelity Managed Retirement in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Managed Ret and Commodities Strategy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Commodities Strategy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Managed. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Managed Ret has no effect on the direction of Commodities Strategy i.e., Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed
Assuming the 90 days horizon Commodities Strategy Fund is expected to under-perform the Fidelity Managed. In addition to that, Commodities Strategy is 3.77 times more volatile than Fidelity Managed Retirement. It trades about -0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Managed Retirement is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 5,237 in Fidelity Managed Retirement on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 199.00 from holding Fidelity Managed Retirement or generate 3.8% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Commodities Strategy Fund vs. Fidelity Managed Retirement
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Commodities Strategy |
| Fidelity Managed Ret |
Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed
The main advantage of trading using opposite Commodities Strategy and Fidelity Managed positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Commodities Strategy position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Managed can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Managed will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Managed's long position.The idea behind Commodities Strategy Fund and Fidelity Managed Retirement pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
| Fidelity Managed vs. Vanguard Windsor Fund | Fidelity Managed vs. Qs Growth Fund | Fidelity Managed vs. Commodities Strategy Fund | Fidelity Managed vs. Eic Value Fund |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.
Other Complementary Tools
| Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated |