Correlation Between Energy Services and Loomis Sayles

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energy Services and Loomis Sayles at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energy Services and Loomis Sayles into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energy Services Fund and Loomis Sayles Inflation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energy Services and Loomis Sayles and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energy Services with a short position of Loomis Sayles. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energy Services and Loomis Sayles.

Diversification Opportunities for Energy Services and Loomis Sayles

0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energy and Loomis is 0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energy Services Fund and Loomis Sayles Inflation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Loomis Sayles Inflation and Energy Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energy Services Fund are associated (or correlated) with Loomis Sayles. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Loomis Sayles Inflation has no effect on the direction of Energy Services i.e., Energy Services and Loomis Sayles go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energy Services and Loomis Sayles

Assuming the 90 days horizon Energy Services Fund is expected to generate 5.1 times more return on investment than Loomis Sayles. However, Energy Services is 5.1 times more volatile than Loomis Sayles Inflation. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Loomis Sayles Inflation is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  21,711  in Energy Services Fund on November 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  476.00  from holding Energy Services Fund or generate 2.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Energy Services Fund  vs.  Loomis Sayles Inflation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Energy Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Energy Services Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's forward indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Loomis Sayles Inflation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Loomis Sayles Inflation are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Loomis Sayles is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Energy Services and Loomis Sayles Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Energy Services and Loomis Sayles

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energy Services and Loomis Sayles positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energy Services position performs unexpectedly, Loomis Sayles can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Loomis Sayles will offset losses from the drop in Loomis Sayles' long position.
The idea behind Energy Services Fund and Loomis Sayles Inflation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency