Correlation Between Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Hartford Moderate Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Moderately Aggressive with a short position of Hartford Moderate. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate.

Diversification Opportunities for Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate

0.81
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Moderately and HARTFORD is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Hartford Moderate Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hartford Moderate and Moderately Aggressive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Moderately Aggressive Balanced are associated (or correlated) with Hartford Moderate. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hartford Moderate has no effect on the direction of Moderately Aggressive i.e., Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate

Assuming the 90 days horizon Moderately Aggressive Balanced is expected to generate 1.24 times more return on investment than Hartford Moderate. However, Moderately Aggressive is 1.24 times more volatile than Hartford Moderate Allocation. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Hartford Moderate Allocation is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,205  in Moderately Aggressive Balanced on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  45.00  from holding Moderately Aggressive Balanced or generate 3.73% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Moderately Aggressive Balanced  vs.  Hartford Moderate Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Moderately Aggressive 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Moderately Aggressive Balanced are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Moderately Aggressive is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Hartford Moderate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hartford Moderate Allocation are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Hartford Moderate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate

The main advantage of trading using opposite Moderately Aggressive and Hartford Moderate positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Moderately Aggressive position performs unexpectedly, Hartford Moderate can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hartford Moderate will offset losses from the drop in Hartford Moderate's long position.
The idea behind Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Hartford Moderate Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm