Correlation Between Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Moderate Balanced Allocation and Guidepath Managed Futures, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Moderate Balanced with a short position of Guidepath(r) Managed. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed.

Diversification Opportunities for Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed

-0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Moderate and Guidepath(r) is -0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Moderate Balanced Allocation and Guidepath Managed Futures in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guidepath Managed Futures and Moderate Balanced is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Moderate Balanced Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Guidepath(r) Managed. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guidepath Managed Futures has no effect on the direction of Moderate Balanced i.e., Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed

Assuming the 90 days horizon Moderate Balanced Allocation is expected to generate 0.91 times more return on investment than Guidepath(r) Managed. However, Moderate Balanced Allocation is 1.1 times less risky than Guidepath(r) Managed. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guidepath Managed Futures is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,151  in Moderate Balanced Allocation on October 18, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  32.00  from holding Moderate Balanced Allocation or generate 2.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Moderate Balanced Allocation  vs.  Guidepath Managed Futures

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Moderate Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Moderate Balanced Allocation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Moderate Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Guidepath Managed Futures 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guidepath Managed Futures are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Guidepath(r) Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed

The main advantage of trading using opposite Moderate Balanced and Guidepath(r) Managed positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Moderate Balanced position performs unexpectedly, Guidepath(r) Managed can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guidepath(r) Managed will offset losses from the drop in Guidepath(r) Managed's long position.
The idea behind Moderate Balanced Allocation and Guidepath Managed Futures pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm