Correlation Between Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Selective Insurance Group and Universal Insurance Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Selective Insurance with a short position of Universal Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance

-0.35
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Selective and Universal is -0.35. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Selective Insurance Group and Universal Insurance Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Universal Insurance and Selective Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Selective Insurance Group are associated (or correlated) with Universal Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Universal Insurance has no effect on the direction of Selective Insurance i.e., Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance

Assuming the 90 days horizon Selective Insurance is expected to generate 3.3 times less return on investment than Universal Insurance. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Selective Insurance Group is 2.99 times less risky than Universal Insurance. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Universal Insurance Holdings is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,002  in Universal Insurance Holdings on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  286.00  from holding Universal Insurance Holdings or generate 14.29% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Selective Insurance Group  vs.  Universal Insurance Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Selective Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Selective Insurance Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable forward indicators, Selective Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Universal Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Universal Insurance Holdings are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather inconsistent basic indicators, Universal Insurance exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Selective Insurance and Universal Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Selective Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Universal Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Universal Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Universal Insurance's long position.
The idea behind Selective Insurance Group and Universal Insurance Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing