Correlation Between Sinch AB and Sivers IMA

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sinch AB and Sivers IMA at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sinch AB and Sivers IMA into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sinch AB and Sivers IMA Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sinch AB and Sivers IMA and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sinch AB with a short position of Sivers IMA. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sinch AB and Sivers IMA.

Diversification Opportunities for Sinch AB and Sivers IMA

0.43
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Sinch and Sivers is 0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sinch AB and Sivers IMA Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sivers IMA Holding and Sinch AB is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sinch AB are associated (or correlated) with Sivers IMA. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sivers IMA Holding has no effect on the direction of Sinch AB i.e., Sinch AB and Sivers IMA go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sinch AB and Sivers IMA

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Sinch AB is expected to under-perform the Sivers IMA. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Sinch AB is 2.42 times less risky than Sivers IMA. The stock trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Sivers IMA Holding is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  396.00  in Sivers IMA Holding on October 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (68.00) from holding Sivers IMA Holding or give up 17.17% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sinch AB  vs.  Sivers IMA Holding

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sinch AB 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sinch AB has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
Sivers IMA Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sivers IMA Holding are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Sivers IMA unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Sinch AB and Sivers IMA Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sinch AB and Sivers IMA

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sinch AB and Sivers IMA positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sinch AB position performs unexpectedly, Sivers IMA can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sivers IMA will offset losses from the drop in Sivers IMA's long position.
The idea behind Sinch AB and Sivers IMA Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes