Correlation Between Science In and General Motors

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Science In and General Motors at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Science In and General Motors into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Science in Sport and General Motors Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Science In and General Motors and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Science In with a short position of General Motors. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Science In and General Motors.

Diversification Opportunities for Science In and General Motors

0.42
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Science and General is 0.42. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Science in Sport and General Motors Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on General Motors and Science In is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Science in Sport are associated (or correlated) with General Motors. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of General Motors has no effect on the direction of Science In i.e., Science In and General Motors go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Science In and General Motors

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Science In is expected to generate 18.41 times less return on investment than General Motors. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Science in Sport is 1.69 times less risky than General Motors. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. General Motors Co is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,180  in General Motors Co on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  160.00  from holding General Motors Co or generate 3.09% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Science in Sport  vs.  General Motors Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Science in Sport 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Science in Sport are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Science In is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors Co are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, General Motors is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Science In and General Motors Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Science In and General Motors

The main advantage of trading using opposite Science In and General Motors positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Science In position performs unexpectedly, General Motors can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in General Motors will offset losses from the drop in General Motors' long position.
The idea behind Science in Sport and General Motors Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Directory module to find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.