Correlation Between Stewart Information and China Oilfield

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Stewart Information and China Oilfield at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Stewart Information and China Oilfield into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Stewart Information Services and China Oilfield Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Stewart Information and China Oilfield and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Stewart Information with a short position of China Oilfield. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Stewart Information and China Oilfield.

Diversification Opportunities for Stewart Information and China Oilfield

-0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Stewart and China is -0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Stewart Information Services and China Oilfield Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Oilfield Services and Stewart Information is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Stewart Information Services are associated (or correlated) with China Oilfield. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Oilfield Services has no effect on the direction of Stewart Information i.e., Stewart Information and China Oilfield go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Stewart Information and China Oilfield

Assuming the 90 days horizon Stewart Information Services is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than China Oilfield. However, Stewart Information Services is 1.9 times less risky than China Oilfield. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Oilfield Services is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,531  in Stewart Information Services on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,469  from holding Stewart Information Services or generate 98.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Stewart Information Services  vs.  China Oilfield Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Stewart Information 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Stewart Information Services are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Stewart Information may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
China Oilfield Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days China Oilfield Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, China Oilfield is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Stewart Information and China Oilfield Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Stewart Information and China Oilfield

The main advantage of trading using opposite Stewart Information and China Oilfield positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Stewart Information position performs unexpectedly, China Oilfield can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Oilfield will offset losses from the drop in China Oilfield's long position.
The idea behind Stewart Information Services and China Oilfield Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Funds Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing