Correlation Between AB SKF and SSAB AB
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both AB SKF and SSAB AB at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining AB SKF and SSAB AB into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between AB SKF and SSAB AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on AB SKF and SSAB AB and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in AB SKF with a short position of SSAB AB. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of AB SKF and SSAB AB.
Diversification Opportunities for AB SKF and SSAB AB
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between SKF-A and SSAB is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding AB SKF and SSAB AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SSAB AB and AB SKF is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on AB SKF are associated (or correlated) with SSAB AB. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SSAB AB has no effect on the direction of AB SKF i.e., AB SKF and SSAB AB go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between AB SKF and SSAB AB
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon AB SKF is expected to generate 1.02 times more return on investment than SSAB AB. However, AB SKF is 1.02 times more volatile than SSAB AB. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. SSAB AB is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest 23,400 in AB SKF on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2,500) from holding AB SKF or give up 10.68% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
AB SKF vs. SSAB AB
Performance |
Timeline |
AB SKF |
SSAB AB |
AB SKF and SSAB AB Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with AB SKF and SSAB AB
The main advantage of trading using opposite AB SKF and SSAB AB positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if AB SKF position performs unexpectedly, SSAB AB can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SSAB AB will offset losses from the drop in SSAB AB's long position.AB SKF vs. AB SKF | AB SKF vs. Industrivarden AB ser | AB SKF vs. Trelleborg AB | AB SKF vs. Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.
Other Complementary Tools
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk |