Correlation Between Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Seligman Munications and Fidelity Select Semiconductors, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Seligman with a short position of Fidelity Select. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select

0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Fidelity is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Seligman Munications and Fidelity Select Semiconductors in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Select Semi and Columbia Seligman is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Seligman Munications are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Select. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Select Semi has no effect on the direction of Columbia Seligman i.e., Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Seligman is expected to generate 1.77 times less return on investment than Fidelity Select. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Columbia Seligman Munications is 1.79 times less risky than Fidelity Select. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Select Semiconductors is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,346  in Fidelity Select Semiconductors on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,062  from holding Fidelity Select Semiconductors or generate 45.27% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Columbia Seligman Munications  vs.  Fidelity Select Semiconductors

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Columbia Seligman 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Seligman Munications are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Columbia Seligman may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Fidelity Select Semi 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Select Semiconductors are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Fidelity Select is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Seligman and Fidelity Select positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Seligman position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Select can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Select will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Select's long position.
The idea behind Columbia Seligman Munications and Fidelity Select Semiconductors pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios