Correlation Between Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Samsung Electronics Co and Raytheon Technologies Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Samsung Electronics with a short position of Raytheon Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies

-0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Samsung and Raytheon is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Samsung Electronics Co and Raytheon Technologies Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Raytheon Technologies and Samsung Electronics is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Samsung Electronics Co are associated (or correlated) with Raytheon Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Raytheon Technologies has no effect on the direction of Samsung Electronics i.e., Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Samsung Electronics Co is expected to under-perform the Raytheon Technologies. In addition to that, Samsung Electronics is 2.2 times more volatile than Raytheon Technologies Corp. It trades about -0.05 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Raytheon Technologies Corp is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  12,486  in Raytheon Technologies Corp on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (402.00) from holding Raytheon Technologies Corp or give up 3.22% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Samsung Electronics Co  vs.  Raytheon Technologies Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Samsung Electronics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Samsung Electronics Co has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
Raytheon Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Raytheon Technologies Corp are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Raytheon Technologies is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite Samsung Electronics and Raytheon Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Samsung Electronics position performs unexpectedly, Raytheon Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Raytheon Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Raytheon Technologies' long position.
The idea behind Samsung Electronics Co and Raytheon Technologies Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance