Correlation Between Spring Ventures and AudioCodes
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Spring Ventures and AudioCodes at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Spring Ventures and AudioCodes into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Spring Ventures and AudioCodes, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Spring Ventures and AudioCodes and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Spring Ventures with a short position of AudioCodes. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Spring Ventures and AudioCodes.
Diversification Opportunities for Spring Ventures and AudioCodes
0.86 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Spring and AudioCodes is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Spring Ventures and AudioCodes in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on AudioCodes and Spring Ventures is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Spring Ventures are associated (or correlated) with AudioCodes. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of AudioCodes has no effect on the direction of Spring Ventures i.e., Spring Ventures and AudioCodes go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Spring Ventures and AudioCodes
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Spring Ventures is expected to under-perform the AudioCodes. In addition to that, Spring Ventures is 1.32 times more volatile than AudioCodes. It trades about -0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. AudioCodes is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 606,754 in AudioCodes on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (268,554) from holding AudioCodes or give up 44.26% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Strong |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Spring Ventures vs. AudioCodes
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Spring Ventures |
| AudioCodes |
Spring Ventures and AudioCodes Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Spring Ventures and AudioCodes
The main advantage of trading using opposite Spring Ventures and AudioCodes positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Spring Ventures position performs unexpectedly, AudioCodes can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in AudioCodes will offset losses from the drop in AudioCodes' long position.| Spring Ventures vs. Capital Point | Spring Ventures vs. Mivtach Shamir | Spring Ventures vs. Fattal 1998 Holdings | Spring Ventures vs. Atreyu Capital Markets |
| AudioCodes vs. Nice | AudioCodes vs. Tower Semiconductor | AudioCodes vs. Elbit Systems | AudioCodes vs. Nova |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.
Other Complementary Tools
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
| Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges |