Correlation Between Starbucks and Collins Foods

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Starbucks and Collins Foods at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Starbucks and Collins Foods into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Starbucks and Collins Foods Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Starbucks and Collins Foods and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Starbucks with a short position of Collins Foods. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Starbucks and Collins Foods.

Diversification Opportunities for Starbucks and Collins Foods

0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Starbucks and Collins is 0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Starbucks and Collins Foods Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Collins Foods Limited and Starbucks is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Starbucks are associated (or correlated) with Collins Foods. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Collins Foods Limited has no effect on the direction of Starbucks i.e., Starbucks and Collins Foods go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Starbucks and Collins Foods

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Starbucks is expected to generate 1.47 times more return on investment than Collins Foods. However, Starbucks is 1.47 times more volatile than Collins Foods Limited. It trades about 0.37 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Collins Foods Limited is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  8,998  in Starbucks on November 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,466  from holding Starbucks or generate 16.29% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Starbucks  vs.  Collins Foods Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Starbucks 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Starbucks are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain fundamental drivers, Starbucks unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Collins Foods Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Collins Foods Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest fragile performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Starbucks and Collins Foods Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Starbucks and Collins Foods

The main advantage of trading using opposite Starbucks and Collins Foods positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Starbucks position performs unexpectedly, Collins Foods can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Collins Foods will offset losses from the drop in Collins Foods' long position.
The idea behind Starbucks and Collins Foods Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.