Correlation Between UBS Property and CSIF I
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between UBS Property and CSIF I Real, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on UBS Property and CSIF I and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in UBS Property with a short position of CSIF I. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of UBS Property and CSIF I.
Diversification Opportunities for UBS Property and CSIF I
0.87 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between UBS and CSIF is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding UBS Property and CSIF I Real in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CSIF I Real and UBS Property is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on UBS Property are associated (or correlated) with CSIF I. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CSIF I Real has no effect on the direction of UBS Property i.e., UBS Property and CSIF I go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between UBS Property and CSIF I
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon UBS Property is expected to generate 1.14 times less return on investment than CSIF I. In addition to that, UBS Property is 1.36 times more volatile than CSIF I Real. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. CSIF I Real is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 168,317 in CSIF I Real on October 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 32,852 from holding CSIF I Real or generate 19.52% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Strong |
| Accuracy | 99.6% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
UBS Property vs. CSIF I Real
Performance |
| Timeline |
| UBS Property |
| CSIF I Real |
UBS Property and CSIF I Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with UBS Property and CSIF I
The main advantage of trading using opposite UBS Property and CSIF I positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if UBS Property position performs unexpectedly, CSIF I can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CSIF I will offset losses from the drop in CSIF I's long position.| UBS Property vs. SF Sustainable Property | UBS Property vs. Swissinvest Real Estate | UBS Property vs. CS Real Estate | UBS Property vs. Procimmo Real Estate |
| CSIF I vs. Procimmo Real Estate | CSIF I vs. SPDR Dow Jones | CSIF I vs. Baloise Holding AG | CSIF I vs. Autoneum Holding AG |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..
Other Complementary Tools
| Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
| Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing | |
| Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
| CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
| Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance |