Correlation Between Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Small Capitalization Portfolio and Large Capitalization Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Small Capitalization with a short position of Large Capitalization. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization.

Diversification Opportunities for Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization

0.89
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Small and Large is 0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Small Capitalization Portfolio and Large Capitalization Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Large Capitalization and Small Capitalization is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Small Capitalization Portfolio are associated (or correlated) with Large Capitalization. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Large Capitalization has no effect on the direction of Small Capitalization i.e., Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization

Assuming the 90 days horizon Small Capitalization is expected to generate 1.13 times less return on investment than Large Capitalization. In addition to that, Small Capitalization is 1.55 times more volatile than Large Capitalization Growth. It trades about 0.19 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Large Capitalization Growth is currently generating about 0.33 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,747  in Large Capitalization Growth on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  228.00  from holding Large Capitalization Growth or generate 8.3% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Small Capitalization Portfolio  vs.  Large Capitalization Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Small Capitalization 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Small Capitalization Portfolio are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Small Capitalization may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Large Capitalization 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Large Capitalization Growth are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Large Capitalization showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization

The main advantage of trading using opposite Small Capitalization and Large Capitalization positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Small Capitalization position performs unexpectedly, Large Capitalization can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Large Capitalization will offset losses from the drop in Large Capitalization's long position.
The idea behind Small Capitalization Portfolio and Large Capitalization Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk