Correlation Between Stellantis and Ford
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Stellantis and Ford at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Stellantis and Ford into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Stellantis NV and Ford Motor, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Stellantis and Ford and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Stellantis with a short position of Ford. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Stellantis and Ford.
Diversification Opportunities for Stellantis and Ford
0.04 | Correlation Coefficient |
Significant diversification
The 3 months correlation between Stellantis and Ford is 0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Stellantis NV and Ford Motor in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ford Motor and Stellantis is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Stellantis NV are associated (or correlated) with Ford. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ford Motor has no effect on the direction of Stellantis i.e., Stellantis and Ford go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Stellantis and Ford
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Stellantis NV is expected to under-perform the Ford. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Stellantis NV is 1.5 times less risky than Ford. The stock trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Ford Motor is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 1,122 in Ford Motor on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 18.00 from holding Ford Motor or generate 1.6% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Stellantis NV vs. Ford Motor
Performance |
Timeline |
Stellantis NV |
Ford Motor |
Stellantis and Ford Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Stellantis and Ford
The main advantage of trading using opposite Stellantis and Ford positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Stellantis position performs unexpectedly, Ford can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ford will offset losses from the drop in Ford's long position.Stellantis vs. Porsche Automobile Holding | Stellantis vs. Toyota Motor | Stellantis vs. Honda Motor Co | Stellantis vs. General Motors |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm |