Correlation Between Spring Valley and Bank of East

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Spring Valley and Bank of East at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Spring Valley and Bank of East into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Spring Valley Acquisition and Bank of East, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Spring Valley and Bank of East and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Spring Valley with a short position of Bank of East. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Spring Valley and Bank of East.

Diversification Opportunities for Spring Valley and Bank of East

0.35
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Spring and Bank is 0.35. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Spring Valley Acquisition and Bank of East in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of East and Spring Valley is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Spring Valley Acquisition are associated (or correlated) with Bank of East. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of East has no effect on the direction of Spring Valley i.e., Spring Valley and Bank of East go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Spring Valley and Bank of East

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Spring Valley Acquisition is expected to generate 0.57 times more return on investment than Bank of East. However, Spring Valley Acquisition is 1.77 times less risky than Bank of East. It trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of East is currently generating about -0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,138  in Spring Valley Acquisition on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (16.00) from holding Spring Valley Acquisition or give up 1.41% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Spring Valley Acquisition  vs.  Bank of East

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Spring Valley Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Spring Valley Acquisition has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fairly strong forward indicators, Spring Valley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.
Bank of East 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of East are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Bank of East is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Spring Valley and Bank of East Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Spring Valley and Bank of East

The main advantage of trading using opposite Spring Valley and Bank of East positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Spring Valley position performs unexpectedly, Bank of East can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of East will offset losses from the drop in Bank of East's long position.
The idea behind Spring Valley Acquisition and Bank of East pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios