Correlation Between Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Templeton Emerging Markets and Commodities Strategy Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Templeton Emerging with a short position of Commodities Strategy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy.

Diversification Opportunities for Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy

0.25
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Templeton and Commodities is 0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Templeton Emerging Markets and Commodities Strategy Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Commodities Strategy and Templeton Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Templeton Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Commodities Strategy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Commodities Strategy has no effect on the direction of Templeton Emerging i.e., Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Templeton Emerging Markets is expected to under-perform the Commodities Strategy. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Templeton Emerging Markets is 2.45 times less risky than Commodities Strategy. The mutual fund trades about -0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Commodities Strategy Fund is currently generating about -0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,043  in Commodities Strategy Fund on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (116.00) from holding Commodities Strategy Fund or give up 3.81% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Templeton Emerging Markets  vs.  Commodities Strategy Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Templeton Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Templeton Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Templeton Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Commodities Strategy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Commodities Strategy Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental drivers, Commodities Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Templeton Emerging and Commodities Strategy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Templeton Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Commodities Strategy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Commodities Strategy will offset losses from the drop in Commodities Strategy's long position.
The idea behind Templeton Emerging Markets and Commodities Strategy Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk