Correlation Between Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Inflation Linked Fixed Income and Growth Portfolio Class, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Inflation-linked with a short position of Growth Portfolio. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio.

Diversification Opportunities for Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio

-0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Inflation-linked and Growth is -0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Inflation Linked Fixed Income and Growth Portfolio Class in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Growth Portfolio Class and Inflation-linked is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Inflation Linked Fixed Income are associated (or correlated) with Growth Portfolio. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Growth Portfolio Class has no effect on the direction of Inflation-linked i.e., Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio

Assuming the 90 days horizon Inflation-linked is expected to generate 64.41 times less return on investment than Growth Portfolio. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Inflation Linked Fixed Income is 5.03 times less risky than Growth Portfolio. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Growth Portfolio Class is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,173  in Growth Portfolio Class on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,649  from holding Growth Portfolio Class or generate 83.49% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Inflation Linked Fixed Income  vs.  Growth Portfolio Class

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Inflation Linked Fixed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Inflation Linked Fixed Income has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Inflation-linked is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Growth Portfolio Class 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

26 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Growth Portfolio Class are ranked lower than 26 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Growth Portfolio showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio

The main advantage of trading using opposite Inflation-linked and Growth Portfolio positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Inflation-linked position performs unexpectedly, Growth Portfolio can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Growth Portfolio will offset losses from the drop in Growth Portfolio's long position.
The idea behind Inflation Linked Fixed Income and Growth Portfolio Class pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences