Correlation Between Tandy Leather and PSJHOG

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Tandy Leather and PSJHOG at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Tandy Leather and PSJHOG into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Tandy Leather Factory and PSJHOG 27 01 OCT 51, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Tandy Leather and PSJHOG and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Tandy Leather with a short position of PSJHOG. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Tandy Leather and PSJHOG.

Diversification Opportunities for Tandy Leather and PSJHOG

TandyPSJHOGDiversified AwayTandyPSJHOGDiversified Away100%
-0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Tandy and PSJHOG is -0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Tandy Leather Factory and PSJHOG 27 01 OCT 51 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PSJHOG 27 01 and Tandy Leather is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Tandy Leather Factory are associated (or correlated) with PSJHOG. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PSJHOG 27 01 has no effect on the direction of Tandy Leather i.e., Tandy Leather and PSJHOG go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Tandy Leather and PSJHOG

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Tandy Leather Factory is expected to generate 1.42 times more return on investment than PSJHOG. However, Tandy Leather is 1.42 times more volatile than PSJHOG 27 01 OCT 51. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. PSJHOG 27 01 OCT 51 is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  316.00  in Tandy Leather Factory on December 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (20.00) from holding Tandy Leather Factory or give up 6.33% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy50.51%
ValuesDaily Returns

Tandy Leather Factory  vs.  PSJHOG 27 01 OCT 51

 Performance 
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15Dec2025Feb 0102030
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15TLF 743820AB8
       Timeline  
Tandy Leather Factory 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Tandy Leather Factory has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15JanFebMarFebMar33.23.43.63.844.2
PSJHOG 27 01 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days PSJHOG 27 01 OCT 51 has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, PSJHOG is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15575859606162

Tandy Leather and PSJHOG Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15-11.91-8.92-5.93-2.940.02.986.019.0412.07 0.050.100.15
JavaScript chart by amCharts 3.21.15TLF 743820AB8
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Tandy Leather and PSJHOG

The main advantage of trading using opposite Tandy Leather and PSJHOG positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Tandy Leather position performs unexpectedly, PSJHOG can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PSJHOG will offset losses from the drop in PSJHOG's long position.
The idea behind Tandy Leather Factory and PSJHOG 27 01 OCT 51 pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm