Correlation Between Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Directional Allocation and Guggenheim Investment Grade, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Directional with a short position of Guggenheim Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment

-0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Guggenheim is -0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Directional Allocat and Guggenheim Investment Grade in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guggenheim Investment and Guggenheim Directional is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Directional Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Guggenheim Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guggenheim Investment has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Directional i.e., Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guggenheim Directional Allocation is expected to generate 2.08 times more return on investment than Guggenheim Investment. However, Guggenheim Directional is 2.08 times more volatile than Guggenheim Investment Grade. It trades about 0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guggenheim Investment Grade is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,978  in Guggenheim Directional Allocation on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  74.00  from holding Guggenheim Directional Allocation or generate 3.74% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guggenheim Directional Allocat  vs.  Guggenheim Investment Grade

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guggenheim Directional 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guggenheim Directional Allocation are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Guggenheim Directional may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Guggenheim Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Guggenheim Investment Grade has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Guggenheim Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Directional and Guggenheim Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Directional position performs unexpectedly, Guggenheim Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guggenheim Investment will offset losses from the drop in Guggenheim Investment's long position.
The idea behind Guggenheim Directional Allocation and Guggenheim Investment Grade pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated