Correlation Between Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Balanced Fund Investor and Strategic Allocation Servative, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Balanced Fund with a short position of Strategic Allocation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation.

Diversification Opportunities for Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation

0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Balanced and Strategic is 0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Balanced Fund Investor and Strategic Allocation Servative in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Strategic Allocation and Balanced Fund is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Balanced Fund Investor are associated (or correlated) with Strategic Allocation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Strategic Allocation has no effect on the direction of Balanced Fund i.e., Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation

Assuming the 90 days horizon Balanced Fund Investor is expected to generate 1.45 times more return on investment than Strategic Allocation. However, Balanced Fund is 1.45 times more volatile than Strategic Allocation Servative. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Strategic Allocation Servative is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,839  in Balanced Fund Investor on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  165.00  from holding Balanced Fund Investor or generate 8.97% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Balanced Fund Investor  vs.  Strategic Allocation Servative

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Balanced Fund Investor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Balanced Fund Investor are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Balanced Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Strategic Allocation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Strategic Allocation Servative are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Strategic Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Balanced Fund and Strategic Allocation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Balanced Fund position performs unexpectedly, Strategic Allocation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Strategic Allocation will offset losses from the drop in Strategic Allocation's long position.
The idea behind Balanced Fund Investor and Strategic Allocation Servative pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets