Correlation Between Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Uber Technologies with a short position of Glacier Bancorp. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp.

Diversification Opportunities for Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp

-0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Uber and Glacier is -0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Glacier Bancorp and Uber Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Uber Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Glacier Bancorp. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Glacier Bancorp has no effect on the direction of Uber Technologies i.e., Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Uber Technologies is expected to generate 2.05 times less return on investment than Glacier Bancorp. In addition to that, Uber Technologies is 1.02 times more volatile than Glacier Bancorp. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Glacier Bancorp is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,587  in Glacier Bancorp on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,251  from holding Glacier Bancorp or generate 62.75% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Uber Technologies  vs.  Glacier Bancorp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Uber Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Uber Technologies has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable technical and fundamental indicators, Uber Technologies is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Glacier Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Glacier Bancorp are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak fundamental indicators, Glacier Bancorp demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp

The main advantage of trading using opposite Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Uber Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Glacier Bancorp can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Glacier Bancorp will offset losses from the drop in Glacier Bancorp's long position.
The idea behind Uber Technologies and Glacier Bancorp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins