Correlation Between Intermediate Term and Global Managed

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Intermediate Term and Global Managed at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Intermediate Term and Global Managed into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Intermediate Term Bond Fund and Global Managed Volatility, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Intermediate Term and Global Managed and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Intermediate Term with a short position of Global Managed. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Intermediate Term and Global Managed.

Diversification Opportunities for Intermediate Term and Global Managed

-0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Intermediate and Global is -0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Intermediate Term Bond Fund and Global Managed Volatility in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global Managed Volatility and Intermediate Term is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Intermediate Term Bond Fund are associated (or correlated) with Global Managed. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global Managed Volatility has no effect on the direction of Intermediate Term i.e., Intermediate Term and Global Managed go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Intermediate Term and Global Managed

Assuming the 90 days horizon Intermediate Term is expected to generate 2.58 times less return on investment than Global Managed. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Intermediate Term Bond Fund is 1.79 times less risky than Global Managed. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Global Managed Volatility is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,161  in Global Managed Volatility on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  13.00  from holding Global Managed Volatility or generate 1.12% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Intermediate Term Bond Fund  vs.  Global Managed Volatility

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Intermediate Term Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Intermediate Term Bond Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Intermediate Term is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Global Managed Volatility 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Global Managed Volatility are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Global Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Intermediate Term and Global Managed Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Intermediate Term and Global Managed

The main advantage of trading using opposite Intermediate Term and Global Managed positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Intermediate Term position performs unexpectedly, Global Managed can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Managed will offset losses from the drop in Global Managed's long position.
The idea behind Intermediate Term Bond Fund and Global Managed Volatility pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories