Correlation Between Adobe and CenterPoint Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Adobe and CenterPoint Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Adobe and CenterPoint Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Adobe 23 percent and CenterPoint Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Adobe and CenterPoint Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Adobe with a short position of CenterPoint Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Adobe and CenterPoint Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Adobe and CenterPoint Energy

-0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Adobe and CenterPoint is -0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Adobe 23 percent and CenterPoint Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CenterPoint Energy and Adobe is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Adobe 23 percent are associated (or correlated) with CenterPoint Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CenterPoint Energy has no effect on the direction of Adobe i.e., Adobe and CenterPoint Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Adobe and CenterPoint Energy

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Adobe 23 percent is expected to under-perform the CenterPoint Energy. But the bond apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Adobe 23 percent is 1.54 times less risky than CenterPoint Energy. The bond trades about -0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The CenterPoint Energy is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,024  in CenterPoint Energy on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  117.00  from holding CenterPoint Energy or generate 3.87% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Adobe 23 percent  vs.  CenterPoint Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Adobe 23 percent 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Adobe 23 percent has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Adobe is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
CenterPoint Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CenterPoint Energy are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively conflicting basic indicators, CenterPoint Energy reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Adobe and CenterPoint Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Adobe and CenterPoint Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Adobe and CenterPoint Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Adobe position performs unexpectedly, CenterPoint Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CenterPoint Energy will offset losses from the drop in CenterPoint Energy's long position.
The idea behind Adobe 23 percent and CenterPoint Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges